This can be shown through the succession crisis, which happened after the death of Edward VI. Faction fighting enabled both the rise and the fall of Somerset. Therefore Wyatt was seen as a hero by many.
On a practical level, the rebellions were marred by chaos and blunder. It also contributed to the economic dislocation witnessed in this period and caused social instability at home.
He could have reformed the taxation and customs systems and brought the financial administration up to date, which was desperately needed. Mary I ascended the throne in When compared to Northumberland, and even Mary, neither of whom should be held responsible for financial problems, it can be seen that Somerset contributed to the crisis.
Mary I had never been trained to rule and did not have incisive intelligence to make up for this. He left a very difficult legacy to his successors, but it must be remembered that Somerset provoked the problems already in existence and Northumberland and Mary I then had the difficult task of resolving them.
Achievements and strengths of the rulers It cannot be denied that Edward VI was a relatively weak monarch, but the consequence of this weakness was that during his reign England was effectively ruled by Somerset and Northumberland, and both these men were not as ineffective as was once held to be the case; in particular, Northumberland provided effective rule given the context in which he operated.
Problems were also caused with the amount of faction at the time, but with the death of Gardiner inthese decreased. In The Mid-Tudor Crisishe argues that eight factors combined to create a crisis in mid-Tudor England: Kent, Devon, Lancashire and the Welsh border were involved, however Kent was the only place where enough troops were gathered.
In fact, they argue, the state machinery survived intact. Therefore this gave an open door way to noblemen who wanted to get what they want by influencing the new king. The danger posed by factions is also limited, since disputes rarely spilled out of the Council itself and destabilised government or society at large.
Intense religious upheaval The turmoil of the English Reformation continued unabated in this period as England vacillated between the moderate reformism of Somerset, the radicalism of Northumberland, and the arid conservatism of Mary.
When Northumberland came into power, even though his reforms were far more extreme, with no possibility of alternative interpretation, he did not at that time cause crisis by putting the country in a firmly Protestant position.
Dissolution of Parliament The fact that Parliament had to be dissolved in, and demonstrates the instability faced at the upper echelons of government. Because of this, Somerset became isolated and could not get the support of councillors when he later needed it Lastly, the Spanish Armada posed a greater threat than the French and Scottish wars of this period.
Foreign policy failures Somerset pursued an expensive and disastrous war with France and Scotland; see Rough Wooingwhich, although ended by Northumberland, saw the loss of Boulogne after the Sieges of Boulogne — ; Boulogne having been again occupied by England from to Especially when there is a power struggle and no longer a royal focus of authority.
However there was logic behind it. To conclude, the rulers in the period to are to be blamed for the crisis. Revisionist counter-interpretation[ edit ] In recent decades revisionist historians, most notably David Loadeshave proposed a new interpretation which almost completely reverses the traditional mid-Tudor crisis thesis: It is evident that Henry was at the root of the financial problems and that Somerset exacerbated them.
It would avoid hostility among nobles, as Courtney would not be raised to royal level.TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THERE A "MID TUDOR CRISIS" DURING THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY I?
"The mid-Tudor crisis" is a term often used by historians to describe the reigns of Edward VI () and. The Mid Tudor Crisis ~ David Loades (Revisionist view) - there was "simmering discontent" in the countryside, where people could not understand why, in a time of good harvests, bread should be so expensive.
In The Mid-Tudor Crisis (), he argues that eight factors combined to create a crisis in mid-Tudor England: Weak rulers Edward VI has been portrayed as a stupid boy who, throughout his reign, was the pawn of two 'regents', Edward Seymour, 1st Duke of Somerset, and John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland.
TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THERE A "MID TUDOR CRISIS" DURING THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY I? "The mid-Tudor crisis" is a term often used by historians to describe the reigns of Edward VI () and Mary I ().
Free Essay: TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THERE A "MID TUDOR CRISIS" DURING THE REIGNS OF EDWARD VI AND MARY I? "The mid-Tudor crisis" is a term. "The mid-Tudor crisis" is a term often used by historians to describe the reigns of Edward VI () and Mary I (). This period can be seen as a crisis, due to the fact that there were so many problems financially, socially, religiously and constitutionally, which led to rebellions, and placed the country in a very unstable position.Download